EPA Clear Water Act Updates July 2022

Two latest occasions associated to the Clear Water Act have piqued the curiosity of many who watch the goings on on the Environmental Safety Company (EPA).

One includes the Spring Unified Regulatory Replace revealed the week of June 20 which experiences that the EPA plans to concern an interim last rule defining the Waters of the USA (WOTUS) in August. This can be a month or two prematurely of the scheduled U.S. Supreme Courtroom oral argument within the present Sackett v. Environmental Safety Company case on October 3, 2022. The regulatory agenda additionally proposes {that a} last WOTUS rule be revealed in March 2023.

It’s actually attainable, if not possible, the federal government will search to complement its briefing in Sackett v Environmental Safety Company, which the U.S. Supreme Courtroom will take up within the fall, after issuing an interim last WOTUS definition. The case offers with a problem to EPA authority and whether or not a wetland is roofed underneath the Clear Water Act. Based mostly on the federal government’s characterization of the impression of Sackett’s proposed WOTUS definition, it’s unlikely that the EPA will concern a definition of WOTUS that will trigger the Sacketts to agree their attraction is moot.

The opposite includes a criticism filed on June 22 within the U.S. District Courtroom for the Southern District of Georgia by Twin Pines Minerals, LLC towards the U.S. Military Corps of Engineers alleges that on June 3, 2022, the Corps rescinded two permitted jurisdictional determinations (AJD), one issued in 2020 and one other in 2021, on the idea that the AJDs should not legitimate “as a result of government-to-government consultations” weren’t carried out as requested by native Indian tribes. The proposed venture is near the Okefenokee Nationwide Wildlife Refuge.

The Corps’ rescission memorandum notes that if the corporate seeks new AJDs, they are going to be issued underneath the phrases of the WOTUS guidelines in impact on the time.

The mining firm pleads that the Corps session coverage in impact on the time of the granting of each AJDs didn’t present for third-party enter (i.e. tribes) on the technical details about the soil, vegetation and hydrology that guides the definition of a wetland. The identical Corps memorandum rescinded the AJDs for the Rosemont mine in Arizona. The Corps additionally has mentioned that it’s going to not concern a Clear Water Act 404 allow with out first finishing an environmental impression assertion, which might not have been required if the 2 AJDs have been in impact.


© 2022 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
Nationwide Legislation Evaluation, Quantity XII, Quantity 189

Previous post What Solvency II Reform Means For The Pensions Deal Market
Next post Hearth Security: Session on the definition of “higher-risk buildings”